Environmental Uncertainty and IT Governance: A Moral Hazard Perspective

نویسنده

  • Ling Xue
چکیده

Prior research considers the IT governance decision to be a trade-off between the cost-efficiency of centralized information processing, and the responsiveness provided by local information processing. Environmental uncertainty plays a major role in this trade-off. In uncertain environments, the need for local information processing dominates the cost-efficiency available from centralization, leading to decentralization in IT governance. This view of the impact of environmental uncertainty on IT governance, however, overlooks the presence of the moral hazard associated with local decisions. Using a moral hazard model, this paper shows that while environmental uncertainty makes decentralization more valuable by enhancing responsiveness to local information; decentralization also exaggerates the moral hazard problem, as it is hard for headquarters to monitor business units’ decisions. By considering the presence of this moral hazard, we show that there exists an inverted-U-shaped relationship between environmental uncertainty and decentralization in IT governance. When the information asymmetry between the headquarters and the business unit is high, increase in environmental uncertainty first increases and then decreases the likelihood of adopting decentralized IT governance. We validate our analytical results using a sample of business units of Fortune 1000 companies. The empirical analysis provides evidence of an inverted-U-shaped relationship between environmental uncertainty and decentralization in IT governance. Moreover, the distance between business units and their headquarters moderates the relationship between environmental uncertainty and decentralization in IT governance.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A Moral Hazard Perspective on Environmental Uncertainty and IT Governance

Using a moral hazard model, this study examines the relationship between environmental uncertainty and the adoption of decentralized IT governance. We show that this relationship is determined by a trade-off between the need for processing local information and the concern on moral hazard. The trade-off results in an inverted-U-shaped relationship between environmental uncertainty and decentral...

متن کامل

Moral Hazard and Risk Management in Agri-Environmental Policy

This paper develops the key finding of Hogan, Ozanne and Colman (2000) that risk aversion among farmers ameliorates the moral hazard problem in relation to agri-environmental policy compliance. It is shown that risk averse farmers who face uncertainty in their production income are more likely to comply with such a policy as a means of risk management. In addition, it is shown that a principal ...

متن کامل

Governance Is Slack ?

The separation of ownership and control in corporations opens up the potential for moral hazard. Thus it is conventional wisdom that managers who are not closely monitored pursue personal goals rather then maximize shareholder wealth. Yet little is known about what these goals are, despite the importance of understanding manager behavior when designing corporate governance rules. This paper pro...

متن کامل

Principals vs . Principles : What Do Managers Do When Governance Is Slack ? ∗

The separation of ownership and control in corporations opens up the potential for moral hazard. Thus it is conventional wisdom that managers who are not closely monitored pursue personal goals rather than maximize shareholder wealth. Yet little is known about what these goals are, despite the importance of understanding manager behavior when designing corporate governance rules. This paper pro...

متن کامل

Review of Evidence between Corporate Governance and Mandatory IFRS Adoption from the Perspective of Agency Theory and Information Asymmetry

Prior studies illustrate the issues of agency theory stemmed from the separation between ownership and management. As such, information asymmetry between the agent and principal is the major reason why agent can take advantages from adverse selection and moral hazard, which is the obvious problem in recent accounting scandals. Boards of directors therefore have fiduciary duties to exercise effe...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008